The next topic in David Wiley’s Introduction to Openness in Education course is Open Business Model. It focused briefly on OpenCourseWare, but mostly looked at business models for free ebooks.
The paper A Sustainable Model for OpenCourseWare Development
(Johansen and Wiley, 2010) described the cost involved to publish
courses openly. Some of these costs include the labor to convert courses
to an OpenCourseWare format, scrubbing to remove copyrighted material,
hardware and software needs, and other supplies. One big question is how
would opening up courses effect paid enrollments. Johansen and Wiley
(2010) found it would be sustainable, however there was no data on
attrition of paid students due to the courses becoming open.
The remainder of the articles to explore were based on open textbooks or other ebooks.
Free: Why Authors are Giving Books Away on the Internet
(Hilton and Wiley, 2010) looked at the effect of free books on sales
of non-digital version. Interviews with authors showed that they are
happy with open publishing . Many see it as providing a wider range of
access to their works. The free version can also act as an enticement to
buy the print version. Regardless of technological advances, people
still like to have paper books. Giving away ebooks provides access and
exposure, but may not necessarily reduce the number of people who
purchase the book.
The Short Term Influence of Free Digital Versions of Books or Print Sales
(Hilton and Wiley, 2010) used Bookscan Data to examine the relationship
between ebooks and the subsequent sales of the paper versions. With the
exception of Tor Books, sales increased. It is important to note that
Tor Books used a different model than the others. The free ebook was
only available online for one week.
Hilton's dissertation
(2010) looked at whether book sales of religious books were affected by
the digital versions. Hilton found that sales increased 26% for the
titles that had ebooks released.
A Sustainable Future for Open Textbooks? The Flat World Knowledge Story
(Hilton and Wiley, 2010) Used Flat World Knowledge (FLK) as a case
study to examine the sustainability of the business model being used.
FLK functions similar to traditional textbook publishers only they are
free. Another unique feature is instructors can remix easily. Titles
have the creative commons licensing of BY-NC-SA.
For students they
can access the free book online and they can also purchase other
versions if they want to. Authors get 20% of sales. Authors are also
able to share their work with their students freely (what a concept,
instructors being able to share their knowledge!). FLK completed alpha
tests that included a faculty review of the business model, faculty
review of prototype, and student review of approach and prototype.
During beta testing 6 books were used in 27 classes with 750 students.
442 students ordered additional resources or the print book.
It is
clear that both faculty and students have interest in open textbooks.
The bigger question to me is not only how to sustain this movement as a
business model, but how to grow it. Open Access Textbooks and Financial Sustainability also
looked at FLK. concluding that the open textbook market has not been
growing as fast as predicted in the sales of electronic textbooks. Why
is this? I know as a student, an electronic version of a text for me,
would not be worth the money. I want both! I need to hold my textbooks,
flip through the pages, take notes on them. However, I also want them on
my iPad. I want to be able to annotate digitally. I do this for journal
articles, why not my texts? I think this is where the business model
that FLK is using has substance. I can access texts electronically and
have a hard copy to hold. I think the next big hurdle for this type of
model is to be able to increase the number of books available before
people look elsewhere. I was disappointed at the small number of
science, math, and professional titles for example. Looking at the costs
associated with each book to produce, being able to do this may take
more time and support.
No comments:
Post a Comment